The Veteran's claims for service connection and higher ratings have been remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding her bowel and bladder incontinence, diabetes mellitus and associated peripheral neuropathy, dysthymic disorder, and TDIU.
The deciding factor: The Board found that further evidence is needed to determine the etiology of the Veteran's bowel and bladder incontinence, as well as the severity of her diabetes mellitus and associated peripheral neuropathy. The impact on her occupational functioning was also addressed.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, menorrhagia with hysterectomy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 9, 2022
- Citation
- 22051251
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22051251.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for bilateral breast cancer and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, finding no evidence of a direct link to the Veteran's active duty or that these conditions were caused by her service-connected multiple sclerosis.
- Denied
The Veteran's TDIU claim for the period prior to July 31, 2015 was denied as her service-connected disabilities did not meet the schedular threshold percentage requirements for consideration of a TDIU.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including her cervical spine and lumbar spine conditions, prevent her from engaging in substantially gainful employment that is consistent with her education and occupational experience.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinions and a missing statement in support of the appeal. The Veteran's service connection claim for her hysterectomy is being reviewed again.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.