The Veteran's lung carcinoma is denied as there was no in-service exposure to herbicide agents and the disease did not manifest within one year of separation. Service connection for a right hip strain disability is granted.,Service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied due to lack of evidence showing it manifested during service or within one year after separation.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's lung carcinoma was not incurred in service as there was no exposure to herbicide agents and the disease did not manifest within a year of separation. The right hip strain disability is considered direct service connection due to its onset during service.,Bilateral hearing loss was not shown to have manifested during service or within one year after separation, thus failing to meet presumptive service connection criteria.
- Claimed conditions
- lung carcinoma, right hip strain disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 10, 2022
- Citation
- 22051565
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22051565.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for low back degenerative arthritis, left hip strain disability, right hip strain disability, and left knee disability as secondary to the Veteran's already service-connected right knee disability.
- Granted
The Board has granted the appellant's claims for recognition as the surviving spouse of the Veteran and service connection for the cause of his death, attributing both to secondary service-connected PTSD.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for SMC based on the need for aid and attendance is remanded due to a duty to assist error. He needs an examination to determine if he requires aid and attendance due to service-connected disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient rationale in the VA opinion regarding asbestos exposure and its relation to the Veteran's cause of death. The Appellant is asked to provide any additional private treatment records, including those reviewed by the September 2019 private physician.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.