Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral upper extremity peripheral neuropathy is denied.,Service connection has been granted for the Veteran's bilateral ankle condition as secondary to his service-connected pes planus. The Board finds that more development is needed for the remaining issues.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy and bilateral finger condition are both remanded due to insufficient evidence.,Service connection has been denied for the Veteran's bilateral finger condition as secondary to his service-connected pes planus.

The deciding factor: There is no current diagnosis of upper extremity radiculopathy or neuropathy in the record, and the VA examiner found that any such conditions are resolved by spinal fusion surgery.,The VA examiner concluded that bilateral ankle strains are at least as likely as not aggravated by the Veteran's service-connected pes planus. The Board finds this opinion inadequate and requires a new examination to determine if there is a causal relationship between the Veteran's bilateral ankle condition and his service-connected pes planus.,The VA examiner found no medical pathophysiologic relationships between pes planus causing or leading to hand strain, and thus concluded that the Veteran's bilateral finger condition is not caused by his service-connected pes planus. The Board finds this opinion inadequate and requires a new examination to determine if there is a causal relationship.,The VA examiner found no medical pathophysiologic relationships between pes planus causing or leading to hand strain, and thus concluded that the Veteran's bilateral finger condition is not caused by his service-connected pes planus. The Board finds this opinion inadequate and requires a new examination to determine if there is a causal relationship.

Claimed conditions
Peripheral neuropathy, bilateral upper extremities, Bilateral ankle condition, Peripheral neuropathy, bilateral lower extremities, Bilateral finger condition
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 19, 2022
Citation
22053161

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22053161.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.