The Board has remanded both issues for additional development, including obtaining clarification on the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed conditions and verifying his service in Southwest Asia.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on conflicting medical opinions regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's conditions and the need to verify his service in Southwest Asia.
- Claimed conditions
- beta thalassemia, retinal hemorrhage
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 21, 2022
- Citation
- 22053575
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22053575.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of consideration of aggravation in the existing medical opinion. The Veteran's beta thalassemia is claimed as service-connected, but there is no evidence provided regarding whether it was aggravated during service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a duty to assist error and will need to obtain additional private treatment records related to the Veteran's eye disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for sickle cell trait and beta thalassemia due to inadequate VA opinions. The Veteran's sickle cell trait is being examined again, and a secondary service connection opinion on bilateral pes planus must be provided.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions due to incomplete medical records and inadequate opinions. The AOJ must obtain any outstanding VA treatment records, provide adequate medical opinions regarding the etiology of the claimed disabilities, and consider a possible secondary relationship between PTSD and hypertension.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.