The Veteran's service connection for cyclical vomiting is granted as a secondary condition to his PTSD with cannabis use disorder.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner opined that the Veteran's cyclic vomiting is more likely due to his service-connected PTSD with cannabis abuse disorder, and not aggravated by service. The examiner also noted that his pancreas divisum (a congenital defect) may have contributed to his vomiting condition.
- Claimed conditions
- cholecystitis, bile gastritis, episodes of emesis
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 23, 2022
- Citation
- 22054200
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22054200.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to non-compliance with prior remand directives and a need for further medical opinions regarding whether pain medications used for service-connected low back disability caused or aggravated gallbladder disability.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for cholecystitis and cholecystectomy as the evidence did not support a link to the Veteran's active military service or his service-connected hepatitis C.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for additional medical opinions to address whether the Veteran's appendicitis and cholecystitis are related to VA treatment in November/December 2011, including any fault or negligence on the part of VA.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for reimbursement of non-VA medical services on October 13, 2014 at Avera McKennan Hospital was denied as VA could not perform the necessary treatment and there was no prior authorization. The Board found that the follow-up procedure was a continuation of his emergency treatment.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.