The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinions in a previous VA examination, and additional development is required.
The deciding factor: The decision was remanded because the prior VA opinion did not consider all relevant evidence of record, including the Veteran's lay statements regarding flare-ups and pain during cold weather.
- Claimed conditions
- Right ulnar nerve paralysis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 29, 2022
- Citation
- 22055509
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22055509.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's request to revise a November 12, 1971 rating decision that granted service connection for right ulnar nerve paralysis and assigned a 40 percent disability rating. The denial was based on the fact that separate muscle group ratings were not combined with the peripheral nerve paralysis rating due to the same body part being affected.
- Denied
The Board found that the veteran's cause of death was not related to his service-connected right ulnar nerve paralysis and residuals, thus denying service connection for the cause of death. The appellant also sought burial benefits but failed to provide sufficient evidence within one year of her brother's death.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.