The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased rating for left leg varicose veins, lumbar spine condition, right hip arthritis, left hip arthritis, cervical spine foraminal stenosis, right upper extremity nerve involvement (claimed as carpal tunnel), left upper extremity nerve involvement (claimed as nerve damage), acid reflux, and sleep apnea are all remanded due to the need for additional examinations and opinions.,The Veteran's lumbar spine condition is remanded because a new VA examination and opinion are needed given her testimony of continued back pain since service. The claim for right hip arthritis and left hip arthritis is also remanded as it involves bilateral hips, necessitating a VA examination and opinion regarding the nature and etiology of these conditions.,The Veteran's cervical spine foraminal stenosis claim is remanded due to its inextricability with her lumbar spine disability. A VA examination and medical nexus opinion are needed for both direct and secondary theories of causation.,The Veteran's claims for right upper extremity nerve involvement (claimed as carpal tunnel) and left upper extremity nerve involvement (claimed as nerve damage) are remanded due to their inextricability with her cervical spine disability. A VA examination and medical nexus opinion regarding the secondary theory of causation is needed.,The Veteran's acid reflux claim is remanded because a VA examination and medical opinion are needed given her service-connected left leg varicose veins and other potential service-connected disabilities, as well as her testimony about obesity being an intermediate step between these conditions and sleep apnea.
The deciding factor: The claims for increased rating and service connection involve complex issues that require additional evidence and analysis. The Veteran's testimony indicates ongoing symptoms since service, necessitating a new examination to determine the current extent of disability.,The Veteran's lumbar spine condition involves bilateral hips, requiring a VA examination and opinion regarding both direct and secondary theories of causation. Her testimony about continued back pain since service is crucial for this determination.,The cervical spine claim is inextricably intertwined with her lumbar spine disability due to the potential for aggravation or secondary effects. A comprehensive examination and medical nexus opinion are needed to address both direct and secondary theories of causation.,Both upper extremity nerve involvement claims involve bilateral conditions that may be related to a single underlying condition (cervical spine). A VA examination and medical nexus opinion regarding the secondary theory of causation is needed.,The Veteran's acid reflux claim involves obesity, which can be an intermediate step between service-connected disabilities and current disability. A VA examination and medical opinion are needed to determine if her sleep apnea is related to her service-connected conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- left leg varicose veins, lumbar spine condition, right hip arthritis, left hip arthritis, cervical spine foraminal stenosis, right upper extremity nerve involvement (claimed as carpal tunnel, right arm), left upper extremity nerve involvement (claimed as nerve damage, left arm), acid reflux, sleep apnea
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 5, 2022
- Citation
- 22056295
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22056295.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for sleep apnea, finding that there was no evidence of a chronic disease manifesting within one year after service and concluding that the current disability is not related to his in-service deviated septum.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development regarding the Veteran's claim of service connection for sleep apnea. The Veteran will be provided with a VA examination to determine if his current sleep disorder is related to his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the issue of service connection for sleep apnea due to insufficient medical opinions and need for further development.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the claims for sleep apnea and an increased disability rating for diabetes mellitus, type II.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.