Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's prostate disorder is not service-connected as there is no evidence of a current diagnosis and the Board finds that his lay assertions are not competent to establish a connection.,There is no confirmed diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities, and the Veteran's lay assertions regarding Agent Orange exposure or secondary to diabetes mellitus are not considered competent medical opinions. The Board finds in equipoise as to whether the Veteran has bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.,The Veteran is granted service connection for bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, with the Board finding that there is no doubt to be resolved.

The deciding factor: There is no confirmed diagnosis of prostate cancer or a current diagnosis of a prostate disorder. The Veteran's lay assertions regarding herbicide exposure are not considered competent medical opinions.,The Veteran does not have a confirmed diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities, and there is no objective evidence of such condition in the record. The Board finds in equipoise as to whether the Veteran has bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.,After review of the medical records, including VA examinations and podiatry consultations, the Board finds that there is no doubt to be resolved regarding the presence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities. The Veteran's lay assertions are not considered competent medical opinions.

Claimed conditions
Prostate Disorder, Peripheral Neuropathy of the Upper Extremities, Peripheral Neuropathy of the Lower Extremities (secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 14, 2022
Citation
22057896

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22057896.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.