The Veteran's claims for effective dates prior to April 14, 1992, and compensable disability ratings for his service-connected hammertoes are remanded due to the need for additional development. The Board also directed the RO to obtain a medical opinion regarding when the Veteran's bilateral hammertoe began.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran was not provided with an adequate VA examination, and thus remanded the claims for further development.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral Hammertoes
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 24, 2022
- Citation
- 22059650
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22059650.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claims for right shoulder disability, bilateral bunions, and bilateral hammertoes should be remanded due to a lack of medical examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that a VA examination is needed to determine the Veteran's ability to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation due to her service-connected disabilities. The appeal will be remanded for this purpose.
- Granted
The Veteran meets the schedular criteria for TDIU and his service-connected disabilities preclude him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation.
- Granted
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for service connection for flat feet and bilateral hammertoes. The evidence submitted since the May 1998 rating decision is sufficient to raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating these claims.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.