The Board has remanded the case due to lack of substantial compliance with previous directives and inadequacy of the examination in addressing environmental exposures during service.
The deciding factor: The VA medical opinion is needed to determine if the Veteran's disability had its onset in service or is related to any in-service injury, event, or disease, including environmental exposures in Southwest Asia.
- Claimed conditions
- weight loss, weakness, lightheadedness
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 25, 2022
- Citation
- 22059986
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22059986.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The appeal has been dismissed due to the Veteran's death. The issues of rating for gastroparesis and service connection for acid erosion of teeth are not addressed as they were pending at the time of the Veteran's death.
- Granted
The Board has granted payment for non-VA ambulance care provided by Southwest on June 2, 2025, to transport the Veteran to Banner Casa Grande Medical Center emergency room due to leg pain and lightheadedness. The claim meets the criteria under section 1725 of the Veterans Millennium Health Care and Benefits Act.
- Granted
The Veteran's inability to self-sustain in the community due to mobility limitations, weakness, and impaired balance requires personal care services for bathing, dressing, undressing, toileting, and mobility. The Board has granted Level 2 PCAFC benefits.
- Partly granted
The Board denied service connection for a disorder manifested by weight loss and remanded the claim for service connection for hypertension, citing an inadequate VA opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's hypertension.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.