Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's hyperlipidemia is not service-connected as it is a laboratory finding, and the claim for this condition is denied.,The Veteran's prostate disability, erectile dysfunction, and kidney disability are not service-connected as they do not meet the criteria based on presumed exposure to herbicide agents in Korea. The claims are remanded for further development regarding potential herbicide agent exposure.,The Veteran's chest scar requires a VA examination to determine its current severity.,The Veteran is invited to provide or identify any documentation of his Parkinson's disease and/or Parkinsonism, as these conditions may be service-connected based on presumed exposure to herbicide agents.

The deciding factor: Hyperlipidemia is not recognized as a disability for VA benefits purposes. The Veteran's hyperlipidemia does not cause impairment of earning capacity or manifest from an injury or disease incurred in service.,The Veteran's prostate, kidney, and erectile disabilities do not meet the criteria for presumptive service connection based on herbicide agent exposure. Further development is needed to determine if the Veteran was exposed to herbicide agents during his service in Korea.,The chest scar requires a VA examination as measurements are necessary for rating purposes.,Parkinson's disease and Parkinsonism may be service-connected based on presumed exposure to herbicide agents, but further evidence from the Veteran or private sources is needed.

Claimed conditions
hyperlipidemia, prostate disability, erectile dysfunction, kidney disability
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 31, 2022
Citation
22061004

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22061004.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.