The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for TMJ, finding that there is no current diagnosis of TMJ and insufficient evidence to establish a link between the condition and his active duty service.,The Board has remanded the issues of service connection for bilateral vision loss and hypertension, as these conditions are claimed to be secondary to the Veteran's service-connected Parkinson's disease. Further medical examination and opinion is needed to determine if these conditions are related to the service-connected disability.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was no current diagnosis of TMJ in the Veteran's case, as his STRs did not show any mention or treatment for TMJ during his active duty. The Board also noted that the Veteran's lay statements and medical records do not provide sufficient evidence to establish a link between TMJ and his service.,The Board found insufficient evidence to determine if bilateral vision loss and hypertension are related to the Veteran's service-connected Parkinson's disease, as remanded for further examination and opinion.
- Claimed conditions
- Temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMJ), Bilateral vision loss, Hypertension
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 2, 2022
- Citation
- 22061420
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22061420.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the claim of service connection for hypertension, finding that it did not manifest during service and is not causally related to the Veteran's exposure to herbicides or service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, finding that there was no evidence of a nexus between his current condition and active duty service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied service connection for hypertension and has remanded the issue of an increased rating for skin condition.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has restored the Veteran's 10% rating for hypertension effective December 1, 2025 and denied a rating in excess of 10%. The reduction from 10% to noncompensable was not proper.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.