The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient service connection opinion and missing documents. The Veteran's basal cell carcinoma is not considered a presumptive condition for Agent Orange exposure, but further examination is needed to determine its etiology.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not provide an adequate service connection opinion based on the lack of a clear link between Agent Orange exposure and basal cell carcinoma.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of basal cell carcinoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 10, 2022
- Citation
- 22063264
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22063264.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service connection claims for a heart condition, residuals of basal cell carcinoma, residuals of melanoma, and sterility are being remanded due to the need for new medical opinions.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of squamous cell carcinoma, residuals of basal cell carcinoma, and actinic keratosis, finding that there is no evidence linking these conditions to his military service or any conceded exposure.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a TDIU prior to January 31, 2011, finding that his service-connected conditions did not prevent him from securing or following substantially gainful employment.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service connection claim for residuals of basal cell carcinoma has been granted. However, her claims for loss of vision in the right eye and depression secondary to this condition have not been resolved due to a duty to assist error.,The Board finds that a VA examination is needed to determine if the Veteran's claimed conditions are related to her service-connected residuals of basal cell carcinoma.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.