Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 40 percent for right leg thrombophlebitis was denied. The Veteran also sought a compensable rating for his right leg scar, which the Board found not warranted based on the evidence of record. Finally, the Veteran's service connection claim for a left leg disability was denied as there is no persuasive medical evidence to support that the condition began during or is otherwise related to his military service.,The Veteran sought a compensable rating for his right leg scar and a rating in excess of 40 percent for his right leg thrombophlebitis. The Board found against him on both counts, stating there was no evidence of persistent edema or subcutaneous induration, stasis pigmentation or eczema, and persistent ulceration; or massive board-like edema with constant pain at rest in the right leg. For his left leg disability, the Veteran's claim for service connection was denied as there is no persuasive medical evidence to support that the condition began during or is otherwise related to his military service.

The deciding factor: The Board found against the Veteran on all three issues due to a lack of evidence supporting the presence of specific symptoms required for higher ratings, and because the medical evidence did not support a finding that the left leg disability was incurred in service.,The Board denied the Veteran's claims based on the absence of evidence showing persistent edema or subcutaneous induration, stasis pigmentation or eczema, and persistent ulceration; or massive board-like edema with constant pain at rest for his right leg thrombophlebitis. For his left leg disability, the Board found no persuasive medical evidence to support a finding that it began during service.

Claimed conditions
right leg thrombophlebitis, left leg disability
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 14, 2022
Citation
22063584

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22063584.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.