Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's appeal for an initial rating greater than 10 percent for tinnitus is denied.,An effective date of August 13, 1982 is granted for the grant of service connection for tinnitus.,Issues related to head injury, headaches, low back condition, speech difficulties due to head injury, sleep disorder (including sleep apnea), and a cyst on the left side of the brain are remanded for further development.,The Veteran's claim to reopen a previously denied claim of service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is also remanded.

The deciding factor: There is no legal basis upon which VA may award a higher schedular evaluation for tinnitus, as it is already rated at the maximum level under Diagnostic Code 6260.,The effective date of August 13, 1982 was granted because this is deemed to be within one year prior to the Veteran's separation from active service and thus falls within the one-year lookback period for effective dates.,Issues related to head injury, headaches, low back condition, speech difficulties due to head injury, sleep disorder (including sleep apnea), and a cyst on the left side of the brain are remanded because additional development is needed to obtain in-service mental health treatment records from the Veteran's period of active service.,The claim to reopen a previously denied claim of service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is remanded as new evidence may be received that could support reopening the claim.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, head injury, headaches, low back condition, speech difficulties due to head injury, sleep disorder (including sleep apnea), cyst, left side of brain
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 23, 2022
Citation
22065661

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22065661.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.