An initial 50 percent rating for disabilities of the left and right feet, effective January 8, 2001, is granted.,An initial, separate 20 percent rating for right knee disability based on frequent episodes of locking, pain, and effusion, effective January 8, 2001, to September 29, 2014, is granted.,An initial, separate, minimum 10 percent rating for right knee disability based on instability, effective January 8, 2001, to September 29, 2014, is granted.,Entitlement to an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for a right knee disability based on limitation of flexion, from January 8, 2001, to September 29, 2014, is remanded.,Entitlement to an initial, separate, rating in excess of 10 percent rating for a right knee disability based on instability, effective January 8, 2001, to September 29, 2014, is remanded.,Entitlement to a rating in excess of 30 percent for a right knee disability from November 1, 2015, is remanded.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's left and right foot disabilities have been productive of symptoms akin to pronounced pes planus since January 8, 2001.,From January 8, 2001, to September 29, 2014, the right knee disability has been productive of episodes of locking, pain, and effusion. From January 8, 2001, to September 29, 2014, the right knee disability has also been productive of at least slight instability.,The Veteran's right knee disability was rated under Diagnostic Code 5258 for frequent episodes of locking, pain, and effusion. A separate rating based on instability (Diagnostic Code 5257) is warranted as well.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Foot Disability, Left Foot Disability, Right Knee Disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 50%
- Decision date
- November 25, 2022
- Citation
- 22065873
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22065873.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected knee disabilities are rated at 10% each, and the Board finds that higher ratings are not warranted based on the evidence of record.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral knee disabilities are not related to his active service, and thus denied both claims for service connection.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection of a right knee disability, finding that there is no evidence to support an etiological relationship between his current condition and his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his low back, left knee, and right knee disabilities due to inadequate VA examinations. The AOJ is instructed to obtain private treatment records from Mays & Schnapp Pain Management and schedule the Veteran for additional medical examinations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.