Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's hypertension claim is denied as there is no evidence of diastolic pressure predominantly 100 mm/Hg or more, systolic pressure predominantly 160 mm/Hg or more, or a history of diastolic pressure predominantly 100 mm/Hg or more requiring continuous medication for control.,The Veteran's knee disabilities and radiculopathy claims are remanded as the effective date prior to November 28, 2014, is not established in the record.,The Veteran's hypothyroidism claim is remanded as there is no evidence of a compensable rating for PSVT.,The Veteran's cervical spine and thoracic/lumbar spine claims are remanded as there is no evidence of entitlement to an increased rating.

The deciding factor: There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the Veteran's hypertension has resulted in diastolic blood pressure predominantly 100 mm/Hg or more, systolic blood pressure predominantly 160 mm/Hg or more, or a history of diastolic blood pressure predominantly 100 mm/Hg or more requiring continuous medication for control.,The effective date prior to November 28, 2014, is not established in the record as there are no clear indications that the Veteran filed timely notices of disagreement regarding these issues.,There is insufficient evidence to support a compensable rating for PSVT as the Veteran's claim has been remanded multiple times and no additional information or evidence has been provided.,The effective date prior to November 28, 2014, is not established in the record as there are no clear indications that the Veteran filed timely notices of disagreement regarding these issues.

Claimed conditions
hypertension, left knee strain with genu valgum deformity, osteoarthritis and scar, right knee strain with genu valgum deformity, osteoarthritis and scar, degenerative disk and joint disease of the thoracic and lumbar spine, left lower extremity radiculopathy, right lower extremity radiculopathy, degenerative disk and joint disease of the cervical spine, left upper extremity radiculopathy, right upper extremity radiculopathy, hypothyroidism, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 14, 2022
Citation
22068613

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22068613.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.