The Board remands the claim for additional development, specifically to obtain an addendum opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's low back disability.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence and a more thorough examination are required to address the chronic back issue from 1988 that was not previously considered.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of back injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 4, 2023
- Citation
- 23000358
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The claim for service connection for back injury residuals has been reopened, but further development is needed. Other claims are remanded.
- Denied
The Board denied the service connection claim for residuals of back or neck injury as new and material evidence was not received to reopen the previously denied claim.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, effective from the date of the February 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's current neck strain is related to his in-service activities.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.