The Board has determined that the VA authorized the Veteran's episode of care from July 1 to July 13, 1992 at SBCMC and a claim for payment or reimbursement was submitted but denied due to an erroneous finding. The Board grants payment or reimbursement.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there had been authorization for the care despite the denial of the claim based on an erroneous finding.
- Claimed conditions
- Hip fracture, Hyponatremia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 9, 2023
- Citation
- 23001171
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,035 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23001171.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board dismissed the claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 and DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to a settlement agreement between the Appellant and VA, which precluded any further action on these claims.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses for treatment at University Hospitals in August and September 2013 are granted, while the claim for reimbursement from Mt. St. Joseph’s Rehabilitation Center in September is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran seeks payment or reimbursement for unauthorized medical expenses incurred at Coshocton County Memorial Hospital on July 6, 2012. The Board finds that additional development is needed to determine if the care provided was within a medical emergency and if a VA facility was feasibly available.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has determined that the service-connected right ankle arthritis did not cause or contribute to the Veteran's death, as the immediate cause of death was hip fracture due to primary central nervous system lymphoma.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.