Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)

The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's left foot disabilities. The Veteran is seeking service connection for his left foot conditions, which include cavovarus foot, bilateral acquired pes cavus, and left foot varus deformity. He also seeks secondary service connection for these conditions as related to his service-connected right ankle surgical repair with debridement, lumbar strain, left ankle scars (painful), right or left ankle scar, and right foot pes cavus. The Board has requested additional opinions from an appropriate clinician to address the nature and etiology of his left foot disabilities.

The deciding factor: The Board found that the previous opinions were inadequate for rating purposes due to lack of explanation regarding how the Veteran's service-connected conditions could have aggravated or caused his left foot disabilities, and also lacked a discussion on the relationship between the Veteran's bilateral ankle disabilities and his left foot condition.

Claimed conditions
left foot cavovarus foot, bilateral acquired pes cavus, left foot varus deformity
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
January 10, 2023
Citation
23001607

Veterans Law Judge

A. J. Spector

Decisions by this judge: 785 · Granted: 34% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23001607.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.