The Board has granted service connection for bilateral end stage glaucoma, finding that the evidence is at least evenly balanced as to whether the Veteran's glaucoma was caused by in-service exposure to chemicals. As a result, the decision grants the Veteran's claim.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was an equipoise of evidence regarding whether the Veteran's bilateral end stage glaucoma was caused by in-service exposure to chemicals, and thus granted service connection based on direct service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral end stage glaucoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 19, 2023
- Citation
- 23003272
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23003272.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's eye conditions, including diabetic retinopathy and other related conditions like bilateral end stage glaucoma, bilateral optic nerve atrophy, right nuclear cataract, and left pseudophakia, are being remanded for further evaluation due to a duty-to-assist error.
- Denied
The Veteran's end stage glaucoma, to include blindness, was not found to be related to service or exposure to ionizing radiation. The claim for service connection is denied.
- Granted
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been presented to reopen the Veteran's claim of service connection for bilateral end stage glaucoma, to include blindness. The March 2003 decision denying a claim of service connection is final, but reopening was granted due to the submission of new evidence.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.