The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's exposure to herbicide agents and contaminants, as well as the relationship between his brain tumor and these exposures. The claim will be further developed to address these issues.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was not enough information to verify the Veteran's claimed exposure to herbicide agents and contaminants, necessitating further development of the case.
- Claimed conditions
- metastatic brain tumor, grade 4 glioblastoma multiforme
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 28, 2023
- Citation
- 23005626
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23005626.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for metastatic brain tumor, parathyroid condition, and skin cancer of the left arm to obtain additional medical evidence.
- Denied
The Board denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that there was no evidence linking the brain tumor to his military service or any service-connected disability.
- Denied
The Veteran's cause of death was not service-connected, and the Board denied both his claim for service connection and his DIC claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's metastatic brain tumor, which is related to his in-service exposure to Agent Orange. The VA examiner did not address a treatment note from less than a week before the separation examination that mentioned severe headaches.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.