The Board denied reopening of a claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding no new and material evidence to support the claim. The appellant argued that pancreatic cancer was due to in-service exposure to herbicide agents and/or asbestos, but the Board found this evidence insufficient to reopen the claim.
The deciding factor: The submitted evidence did not provide a new theory of entitlement or raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim based on a new theory of entitlement.
- Claimed conditions
- pancreatic carcinoma
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 31, 2023
- Citation
- 23006130
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23006130.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that new and relevant evidence has been received, specifically the Appellant's May 2024 hearing testimony. The claim for service connection for cause of death is remanded due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, but further review is needed as there are conflicting opinions regarding the cause of death.
- Granted
The Board has granted the appellant's claims for recognition as the surviving spouse of the Veteran and service connection for the cause of his death, attributing both to secondary service-connected PTSD.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board denied the claim for survivor's pension benefits due to lack of wartime service. The DIC claim is remanded as there may be exposure to asbestos and further development is needed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.