The Board has determined that the remand directives have not been completed as directed and another remand is necessary to obtain a retrospective opinion on the Veteran's right knee disability throughout the entire appeal period.
The deciding factor: The remand directive was not fully complied with, specifically regarding the range of motion assessment from October 28, 2013 to the date of examination.
- Claimed conditions
- right knee anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear with surgical reconstruction, instability, Baker's cyst
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 2, 2023
- Citation
- 23006598
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23006598.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeals for service connection for instability, a low back condition, bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy, rhinitis, and sinusitis, as well as entitlement to a TDIU.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current bilateral knee disability, including arthritis, is service connected as it had its onset during his active service and there is no clear and unmistakable error in previous decisions. The appeal for service connection is granted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his left knee meniscal tear and degenerative arthritis with instability was granted, with the effective date being June 1, 2020. The Board found that the Veteran exhibited slight instability in his left knee during the appeal period.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for instability secondary to his right toe condition as secondary to residual pain, gout, arthritis in right foot due to surgery/right big toe deformity because there was no evidence showing that the instability was incurred or aggravated by service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.