Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The petition to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is granted.,The petition to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to an acquired psychiatric disorder is granted.,The petition to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for headaches is granted.,The petition to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for anemia is denied.,The petition to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for a right great toe disability is denied.

The deciding factor: New and material evidence has been received since the previous decisions, raising a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claims for service connection for these conditions.,New and material evidence has been received since the previous decisions, raising a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to an acquired psychiatric disorder.,New and material evidence has been received since the previous decisions, raising a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim for service connection for headaches. The Veteran's current diagnosis is considered in determining this.,The evidence does not relate to unestablished facts or raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claims for anemia.,The evidence does not relate to unestablished facts or raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim for a right great toe disability.

Claimed conditions
Acquired psychiatric disorder, Erectile dysfunction, Headaches, Anemia, Right great toe disability
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 4, 2023
Citation
23007266

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23007266.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.