The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for PVD of both lower extremities due to a recent passage of the Honoring our PACT Act, which now considers hypertension presumptively related to herbicide exposure. The claim must be further investigated to determine if the Veteran was exposed to herbicide agents during his service aboard ships in Vietnam.
The deciding factor: The Board has jurisdiction over all issues related to the claims and has determined that hypertension is now considered presumptively related to herbicide exposure under the PACT Act, necessitating a remand for verification of the Veteran's in-service exposure to herbicide agents.
- Claimed conditions
- Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) of the left lower extremity (LLE), Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) of the right lower extremity (RLE)
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 4, 2023
- Citation
- 23007274
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23007274.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for PVD of both lower extremities and residuals of rectal abscess surgical repair due to inadequate opinions regarding aggravation by service-connected conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and TDIU prior to November 6, 2017 are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and consideration of new evidence.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claims for service connection for PVD of both his left and right lower extremities, as these conditions are found to be secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus type 2.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.