The Board has remanded the claims for an initial disability rating in excess of 10 percent for psoriasis with residual scarring and unstable scarring prior to October 4, 2018 due to insufficient compliance with previous remand directives.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not address the Veteran's use of topical Clobetasol and Tacrolimus during the period prior to October 4, 2018 as directed in the June 2019 Board remand.
- Claimed conditions
- psoriasis with residual scarring of the head, psoriasis with residual unstable scarring
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 10, 2023
- Citation
- 23008830
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23008830.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that additional development is needed for the remaining claims on appeal, including a new opinion regarding the Veteran's topical treatment with corticosteroid Clobetasol and Tacrolimus.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to properly evaluate the appellant's psoriasis and related conditions, specifically regarding the nature of his topical corticosteroid treatments.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.