The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's lung disorder, including airway obstruction, began during service or developed from a local infection. The AOJ is instructed to obtain an addendum opinion from the physician who provided the June 2020 opinion.
The deciding factor: The Board found the previous medical opinions inadequate and remanded for further clarification on the Veteran's lung conditions and their relation to his service at Camp Lejeune.
- Claimed conditions
- lung disorder, airway obstruction
- How they argued it
- Aggravation of a pre-existing condition
- Exposure basis
- Camp Lejeune water
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 10, 2023
- Citation
- 23009006
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23009006.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for service connection for lung and lumbar spine disorders have been dismissed due to his withdrawal of the appeals prior to the promulgation of a decision.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected lung disorder and anxiety and delusional disorders render her incapable of obtaining and maintaining gainful employment as of July 2, 2025. Prior to that date, the evidence does not show she was unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation due solely to her service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for lung, heart, and prostate disorders due to exposure to ionizing radiation in service. The claims were found not to be related to the Veteran's service.
- Denied
The Veteran's lung disorder was not incurred in service and no presumption of service connection applies. The Board denied the claim as there is no current showing of a lung disorder at any time during the appeal period.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.