The Veteran's acquired skin disability is rated at 30 percent, which does not meet the criteria for a higher rating. The Board also denied his claim for TDIU prior to September 1, 2019.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not show that the Veteran's acquired skin disability more nearly approximated the criteria for a higher rating under either the pre-amendment or amended rating criteria.
- Claimed conditions
- acquired skin disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 14, 2023
- Citation
- 23009518
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23009518.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claim due to new evidence and a need for a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's skin conditions, including seborrheic and actinic keratosis, compound nevus, lentigo, furuncle and burn on the left chest, and basal cell carcinoma, were not shown to be related to service or due to exposure to herbicide agents. The Board denied service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's petition to reopen his claim for service connection for an acquired skin disability, finding that the new evidence submitted is not material and does not relate to unestablished facts necessary to substantiate the claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for DRO review due to a request from the Veteran's representative. The issue of whether new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen a claim for service connection for an acquired skin disability remains on appeal.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.