The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the right and left lower extremities due to new evidence submitted. The claims are remanded for further development, including VA examinations.
The deciding factor: New evidence raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claims of service connection for RLE and LLE peripheral neuropathy.
- Claimed conditions
- Peripheral neuropathy, left lower extremity (LLE), Peripheral neuropathy, right lower extremity (RLE)
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Gulf War
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 15, 2023
- Citation
- 23009667
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23009667.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claims for service connection for peripheral neuropathy, left and right lower extremities are granted due to in-service exposure to herbicide agents. The issue of a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss is dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for peripheral neuropathy in both upper and lower extremities due to conflicting medical opinions regarding the etiology of the condition. The Veteran's exposure to Agent Orange is presumed, but a new VA examination is needed to clarify the relationship between his neuropathy and this exposure.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
- Whole decision: Granted
Service connection for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is granted. The appeal as to the issue of entitlement to service connection for erectile dysfunction is dismissed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.