The Veteran's perirectal abscess prior to January 13, 2017 is rated at 10 percent.,The Veteran's perirectal abscess from January 13, 2017 is rated at more than 30 percent.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not show occasional involuntary bowel movements necessitating the wearing of a pad for the period prior to January 13, 2017.,The Veteran's leakage has been characterized as occasional and there is no indication of extensive leakage or complete sphincter control.
- Claimed conditions
- perirectal abscess
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 15, 2023
- Citation
- 23009777
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23009777.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for 38 U.S.C. § 1151 compensation benefits was denied because the Board found that her anal fistula and abscess were not caused by VA medical care, despite her assertions to the contrary.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevented her from working from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007 and from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for higher ratings for his service-connected left knee disorder and a TDIU prior to January 21, 2022 are being remanded due to procedural issues and the need for clarification regarding the nature of his knee disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that additional development is needed for the issues on appeal, including obtaining relevant records from SSA and VA. The case will be returned to the Board after compliance with these procedures.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.