The Board has remanded the case due to issues related to informed consent for sinus surgery, including numbness around left eye, problems with concentration, sleeping, redness, and itching.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for a new VA medical opinion regarding the validity of the Veteran's informed consent and whether it was negligent for his physicians to have proceeded with the trephination procedure given the circumstances at the time.
- Claimed conditions
- numbness around left eye, problems with concentration, sleeping problems, redness, itching
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 23, 2023
- Citation
- 23011122
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23011122.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error regarding the etiology of memory and concentration problems, which were not adequately addressed in the March 2021 VA examination. The Veteran's service-connected headaches may be related to an in-service head injury, and post-service records document reported memory issues.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for twitching and/or itching and/or small fiber neuropathy is being remanded due to the need for further examination and evaluation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claim due to insufficient reasoning in the August 2021 decision regarding whether the Veteran had additional disability resulting from VA treatment. Additional development is needed, including obtaining a new VA medical opinion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete medical records and a need for further examination. The Veteran's skin rash needs to be evaluated again, especially in relation to his military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.