Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's claim of service connection for diabetes was denied in the February 2010 Board decision. New evidence received since then is not material to reopen this claim.,Right ear tinnitus was not shown as chronic in service and did not manifest within a year after discharge, nor is there continuity of symptomatology or etiological link to service. The Veteran's current right ear tinnitus is rated at 10 percent disabling under DC 7122 for arthralgia or other pain, numbness, or cold sensitivity.,Frostbite residuals of the left and right hands have been rated at 10 percent since May 11, 2016. The Veteran's current condition includes arthralgia, numbness, and cold sensitivity with tissue loss from frostbite. A higher rating is not warranted as there are no additional symptoms such as nail abnormalities, color changes, locally impaired sensation, hyperhidrosis, or x-ray abnormalities.

The deciding factor: The new evidence does not provide any information that would raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim of service connection for diabetes. The Veteran's glucose levels were normal during service and did not show pre-diabetic range.,Right ear tinnitus was not shown as chronic in service, nor is there continuity of symptomatology or etiological link to service. The current condition does not meet the criteria for a higher rating under DC 7122 due to lack of additional symptoms such as nail abnormalities, color changes, locally impaired sensation, hyperhidrosis, or x-ray abnormalities.,The Veteran's frostbite residuals have tissue loss and are rated at 20 percent since May 11, 2016. However, the current condition does not meet the criteria for a higher rating as there are no additional symptoms such as nail abnormalities, color changes, locally impaired sensation, hyperhidrosis, or x-ray abnormalities.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus type II (diabetes), right ear tinnitus, frostbite residuals of the left hand, frostbite residuals of the right hand
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 24, 2023
Citation
23011517

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23011517.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.