The Board has found that the development conducted does not comply with the August 2022 Board remand and has ordered additional development, including obtaining VA medical records and providing an addendum opinion.
The deciding factor: The Board finds that the previous remand directives were not fully complied with due to missing VA medical center records indicating worsening symptoms prior to the Veteran's right below knee amputation.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Below Knee Amputation
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 24, 2023
- Citation
- 23011613
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23011613.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for the right below knee amputation due to a finding that it was not caused or aggravated by VA care, and no fault on VA's part.
- Granted
The Veteran's right below the knee amputation and fracture right femur residuals are rated at 60 percent, reflecting a condition not improvable by prosthesis controlled by natural knee action. The rating for the fracture is unchanged.
- Granted
The appellant has additional disability, namely a right below knee amputation, that resulted from VA medical treatment rendered in July 1989. The Board finds there was a causal relationship between the cardiac catheterization performed by VA and the subsequent development of ischemia in the right foot and leg.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.