The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to inadequate VA examinations and insufficient evidence regarding the etiology of his neck, bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, and back disabilities. The Veteran is also being asked to provide additional information about flareups and repeated use over time.
The deciding factor: The VA examinations were not adequate in addressing the etiology of the Veteran's conditions due to lack of sufficient evidence or information.
- Claimed conditions
- Degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine post fusion, congenital cervical canal stenosis (neck disability), Carpal tunnel syndrome, left, Carpal tunnel syndrome, right, Lumbar disc herniation status post discectomy with radiculopathy (low back disability)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 4, 2023
- Citation
- 23013280
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23013280.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's HIV and bilateral upper and lower extremity peripheral neuropathies are denied as they do not meet the criteria for service connection due to a dishonorable discharge from active duty. The sinus disability claim is also denied.,Service connection for carpal tunnel syndrome, right; left, PTSD, and head trauma secondary to PTSD are remanded for further development.
- Denied
The veteran's non-service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for special monthly pension based on a need for aid and attendance or housebound status.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.