The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the Veteran's allergic conjunctivitis. The matter is now being sent back for further development and readjudication.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the previous medical opinions were inadequate as they did not properly assess whether the Veteran's allergic conjunctivitis was aggravated by service.
- Claimed conditions
- Allergic Conjunctivitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 21, 2023
- Citation
- 23017564
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23017564.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, except for eczema and skin rash, are associated with his subsequent period of active duty after he received separation pay. Therefore, the appeal is granted as recoupment of the Veteran's separation pay in the amount of $13,271.16 is improper.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral allergic conjunctivitis has been active within the appeal period, warranting a minimum rating of 10 percent under the Diagnostic Code.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for allergies, including eye allergies now diagnosed as allergic conjunctivitis, finding that the Veteran's symptoms had their onset during active service and resolving reasonable doubt in his favor.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for tuberculosis, hepatitis, and sinusitis due to lack of service connection. The heart murmur claim was granted but later severed due to clear and unmistakable error. The Veteran's inguinal hernia and hemorrhoids were not rated as compensable.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.