The Veteran's claims for right thigh condition, bilateral ear condition, and lung nodules due to asbestos exposure are remanded as the VA has not provided a VA examination for these issues.
The deciding factor: The Board finds that the evidence does not contain sufficient competent medical evidence to decide the claim of service connection for the Veteran's right thigh condition, bilateral ear condition, or lung nodules due to asbestos exposure and thus requires further development with a VA examination.
- Claimed conditions
- lung nodules, right thigh condition, bilateral ear condition
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 4, 2023
- Citation
- 23020586
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23020586.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for service connection were dismissed due to procedural defects in the submission of the VA Form 10182, which was not an accepted format for appeal in the modernized review system.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the Veteran's appeal because his request for an extension of time to file a Board Appeal request was not timely, and good cause has not been shown.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's lung disability is remanded for a new medical opinion considering her service-related toxic exposure, including aerosolized mercury as a dental assistant and potential environmental exposures at Fort McClellan.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a right thigh condition due to insufficient medical evidence and the need for an addendum opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.