The Board has remanded the case for further development regarding service connection for diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM II). The Veteran's representative needs to provide full copies of internet articles cited in his June 2018 Notice of Disagreement and October 2020 Brief. Additional medical opinions are needed addressing the relationship between the Veteran's military service, service-connected migraines, obesity, and DM II.
The deciding factor: The Board found that additional development is necessary to address the treatise literature referenced by the Veteran's pleadings and briefs.
- Claimed conditions
- diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM II)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 5, 2023
- Citation
- 23020922
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23020922.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus type 2 as it was found to be a pre-existing condition that did not increase in severity during the Veteran's active duty beyond its natural progression.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to ensure compliance with previous remand directives and proper development for the Veteran's claims.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM II) as there was no evidence of exposure to herbicide agents during service and no in-service disease or injury related to DM II. The Veteran did not meet the threshold requirement for a VA examination.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, and obstructive sleep apnea. The decision found that the Veteran's CAD and DM II did not manifest in service or were not related to his military service. For OSA, the Board determined it was not caused by a service-connected disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.