The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinions and a need for further examination regarding the Veteran's claim of service connection for spasmodic dysphonia.
The deciding factor: The opinion provided by the VA examiner was insufficient, lacking an adequate rationale and based on outdated information. The Veteran's condition must be re-evaluated with new evidence and medical input.
- Claimed conditions
- Spasmodic dysphonia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 6, 2023
- Citation
- 23021424
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23021424.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for spasmodic dysphonia is remanded due to a pre-decisional duty-to-assist error in the AOJ's failure to provide the correct VA examination necessary to properly apply the correct diagnostic code for his service-connected disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating of 30 percent for spasmodic dysphonia is granted. The issue of TDIU has been remanded due to lack of clarity in the employment and education history.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to new evidence submitted by the Veteran and a need for a contemporaneous VA examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's spasmodic dysphonia existed prior to service and was aggravated by service. The claim will be reviewed again with proper legal standards applied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.