The Veteran's cause of death is remanded, and the Board requests additional evidence to determine if his salivary gland cancer was related to herbicide exposure or ionizing radiation. The claim will be reconsidered after this development.
The deciding factor: The decision requires further evidentiary development regarding both ionizing radiation and herbicide agent exposure claims for the Veteran's salivary gland cancer.
- Claimed conditions
- parotid gland cancer
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 7, 2023
- Citation
- 23021478
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23021478.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's parotid gland cancer is granted as service connected due to exposure to herbicide agent while serving in Vietnam.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for tinnitus and parotid gland cancer due to herbicide exposure. The decision is based on insufficient information regarding the etiology of the Veteran's tinnitus, as well as a need for additional medical opinions regarding his parotid gland cancer.
- Granted
The Veteran's cause of death is granted due to service-connected parotid gland cancer, which was presumed to be caused by Agent Orange exposure during his military service. DIC benefits are denied as the Veteran did not meet the criteria for entitlement under 38 U.S.C. § 1318.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for parotid gland cancer, finding that there was no evidence to support a link between his active duty service and the condition. The Board also found insufficient evidence to establish a direct service connection due to lack of credible medical opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.