Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board has accepted the Veteran's February 2018 Notice of Disagreement as timely filed, finding that there is sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption of regularity in this case. The appeal was granted for some issues and denied for others.

The deciding factor: The Board found sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption of regularity regarding the receipt of the August 2016 rating decision by the Veteran's attorney, including a request for status update and lack of address in the CC line.

Claimed conditions
residuals of a low back strain, right shoulder condition
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 10, 2023
Citation
23021778

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23021778.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.