Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has remanded the case due to the Appellant's income exceeding the maximum annual pension rate for survivor's pension benefits. The claim is referred back to the AOJ for the Appellant to submit evidence of out-of-pocket medical expenses that were paid during the period on appeal.

The deciding factor: Income exceeds the maximum annual pension rate, requiring submission of evidence of out-of-pocket medical expenses.

Claimed conditions
Not specified in this decision
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 25, 2023
Citation
23023659

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23023659.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.