The Board has remanded the cases for further development due to inadequate examination and opinion regarding service connection for melanoma of the left chest and squamous cell carcinoma of the right temple and above the left eyebrow, both linked to Agent Orange exposure.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not provide a thorough or reasoned opinion addressing the etiology of the Veteran's conditions as related to his conceded exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam.
- Claimed conditions
- melanoma of the left chest, squamous cell carcinoma of the right temple and above the left eyebrow
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 25, 2023
- Citation
- 23023687
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23023687.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for melanoma of the left chest and squamous cell carcinoma of the right temple and above the left eyebrow, finding a link to herbicide exposure in service. The issue regarding a lymph node disability, diagnosed as esophageal cancer, was remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded two cases involving the Veteran's claims for service connection for melanoma of the left chest and squamous cell carcinoma of the right temple and above the left eyebrow, both linked to Agent Orange exposure. The decision also notes that the Veteran's service-connected squamous cell carcinoma of the left tongue base may be related to these conditions.
- Denied
The Veteran's melanoma of the left chest and squamous cell carcinoma of the right temple and above the left eyebrow were not found to be related to his service, including exposure to Agent Orange.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.