The Board has granted a 100% rating for cerebrovascular accident from June 12, 2011 to December 31, 2011. The issue of service connection for left eye visual problem as a residual of cerebrovascular accident is remanded. A compensable rating for residuals of thoracotomy scar is also remanded.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's representative argued that the Veteran suffered two strokes and provided supporting medical records, which were found to support this argument by the Board. The issue of service connection for left eye visual problem as a residual of cerebrovascular accident was not addressed in the original decision and is therefore remanded.
- Claimed conditions
- Cerebrovascular Accident, Left Eye Visual Problem
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 25, 2023
- Citation
- 23023893
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23023893.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that there was a duty to assist error regarding the Veteran's treatment on August 9 and 10, 2012. The case is being remanded for further examination and opinion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to outstanding VA treatment records for the period since August 11, 2017. The Veteran's service-connected PTSD and cerebrovascular accident are being reviewed.
- Denied
The Board denied reopening of the claims for service connection for various conditions, including nicotine dependence, coronary artery disease, neuropathy of the legs, loss of vision in the left eye, cataracts, atrial fibrillation, obesity, cerebrovascular accident, diabetes mellitus, porokeratosis, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The Board found that new evidence did not establish a relationship to service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient opinions from VA examiners regarding whether the Veteran's claimed additional disabilities were caused by VA prescribed medications for hypertension, and if so, whether they were reasonably foreseeable.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.