Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service connected. The cervical spine, lumbar spine, right hip, left hip, and kidney disabilities are remanded for further development.

The deciding factor: The Veteran has provided credible testimony regarding the onset of her tinnitus during active duty and its continued presence since then. For rheumatism (also claimed as rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis) of the cervical spine, lumbar spine, right hip, left hip, and kidney disabilities, further development is needed to verify exposure to ionizing radiation or toxins.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, rheumatism (also claimed as rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis) of the cervical spine, a cervical spine disability (claimed as neck pain), rheumatism (also claimed as rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis) of the lumbar spine, a lumbosacral back disability (claimed as back pain), rheumatism (also claimed as rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis) of the right hip, a right hip disability (claimed as right hip pain), rheumatism (also claimed as rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis) of the left hip, a left hip disability (claimed as left hip pain), anemia, osteoarthritis of the right knee, a right knee disability (claimed as right knee pain), osteoarthritis of the left knee, a left knee disability (claimed as left knee pain), osteoarthritis of the right wrist, osteoarthritis of the left wrist, osteoarthritis of the right ankle, a right ankle disability (claimed as right ankle pain), osteoarthritis of the left ankle, a left ankle disability (claimed as left ankle pain), rheumatoid arthritis, kidney disability
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 27, 2023
Citation
23024424

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23024424.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.