The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the Veteran's back disability, specifically related to the ameliorative effects of her medications on past VA examinations.
The deciding factor: The Board found that previous medical opinions did not adequately address the possible ameliorative effects of the Veteran's medication use during past VA examinations.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a fracture of the L2 vertebra with chronic low back pain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 27, 2023
- Citation
- 23024615
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23024615.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for further development, specifically to obtain an opinion addressing whether the Veteran's back disability results in the functional equivalent of ankylosis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical evidence and need for further examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that further development is necessary before the claim can be adjudicated, and therefore, the case is being remanded for additional medical examination and evaluation.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.