The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for his service-connected bilateral inguinal hernia is being remanded due to the need for updated medical records and a new VA examination.
The deciding factor: The Veteran reported that his service-connected hernia appears to have worsened, necessitating further evaluation.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral inguinal hernia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 2, 2023
- Citation
- 23025252
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23025252.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's appeal for service connection for right shoulder pinched nerve (tendonitis bicipital). The appeals for bilateral inguinal hernia, right foot tingling and numbness in toes, and sleep apnea with CPAP are remanded.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for a hiatal hernia and a bilateral inguinal hernia as there was no evidence of a current disability, and the medical evidence did not support a finding that either condition was due to or aggravated by service-connected bladder cancer.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board dismissed the veteran's appeals for a higher level of special monthly compensation, service connection for chronic fatigue syndrome, an earlier effective date for headaches, and an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for a bilateral inguinal hernia disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA examination and medical opinion are inadequate, as they did not consider the Veteran's lay statements regarding his current symptoms. The Board is therefore remanding the case to obtain a new examination and opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.