Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Veteran's appeal for an initial compensable rating for scar, status post spinal fusion, was dismissed. The claim of residuals of head trauma (claimed as dental trauma) has been reopened and is currently under consideration. Service connection for diabetes mellitus, type 2, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastroenteritis, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), respiratory disorder (recurrent aspiration pneumonia), cardiac disorder (atherosclerosis), acquired psychiatric disorder, residuals of head trauma, facial scars, bilateral eye disorder, cervical spine disorder, right shoulder disorder, bilateral elbow disorder (tendinitis), bilateral plantar fasciitis, and bilateral pes planus have been remanded for further review.

The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeal for an initial compensable rating for scar, status post spinal fusion. The claim of residuals of head trauma has been reopened due to new evidence that raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim. Service connection for diabetes mellitus, type 2, and other conditions have been remanded as they require further review.

Claimed conditions
scar, status post spinal fusion, residuals of head trauma (claimed as dental trauma), diabetes mellitus, type 2, degenerative disc disease and intervertebral disc syndrome, status post spinal fusion, radiculopathy of the left lower extremity, radiculopathy of the right lower extremity, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastroenteritis, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), respiratory disorder (claimed as recurrent aspiration pneumonia), cardiac disorder (to include atherosclerosis), acquired psychiatric disorder, facial scars, bilateral eye disorder, cervical spine disorder, right shoulder disorder, bilateral elbow disorder (claimed as tendinitis), bilateral plantar fasciitis, bilateral pes planus, skin disorder (to include pseudofolliculitis barbae)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 3, 2023
Citation
23025676

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23025676.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.