The Board has determined that additional development is needed for the Veteran's claims of service connection for recurrent tinnitus, a uterus disability, and a total hysterectomy. The claims are being remanded to provide addendum VA medical opinions.
The deciding factor: The Board finds that the current medical evidence is insufficient to determine whether the Veteran's conditions are related to her active duty service or secondary to her service-connected bilateral hearing loss.
- Claimed conditions
- recurrent tinnitus, uterus disability (including uterine fibroids), total hysterectomy
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 5, 2023
- Citation
- 23026122
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23026122.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a duty to assist error, specifically failing to obtain an adequate medical opinion on whether the Veteran's recurrent tinnitus is proximately due or aggravated by his service-connected hypertension.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities rendered him substantially confined to his dwelling and immediate premises prior to his death, granting entitlement to special monthly compensation (SMC) based on housebound status for accrued purposes.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claim for recurrent tinnitus due to a duty-to-assist error, requiring further development and examination.
- Dismissed
The appeal was dismissed as the Board Appeal request was not timely filed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.