The Board has determined that the VA examination and opinions provided were not sufficient to make an informed decision on the Veteran's claims for service connection for tachybrady syndrome and implanted cardiac pacemaker. The case is being remanded for further development, including obtaining additional medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's heart conditions and considering all potential exposure risks.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the previous VA examination and opinions were not supported by sufficient rationale to make an informed decision on the claim, particularly regarding the etiology of the Veteran's heart conditions. The case is being remanded for further development with additional medical opinions.
- Claimed conditions
- tachybrady syndrome, implanted cardiac pacemaker
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 5, 2023
- Citation
- 23026132
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23026132.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to errors in providing notice of a hearing and for reopening the claim.
- Granted
The Board has granted a maximum schedular rating of 100 percent for the Veteran's atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with implanted pacemaker, effective February 1, 2024.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a heart disability, finding that the Veteran's conditions are not related to his military service.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for squamous cell cancer and denied the claims for an earlier effective date, service connection for implanted cardiac pacemaker, and several other conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.